[ad_1]
Categorical Information Service
KOCHI: After being in jail for 5 years as a remand prisoner, a Filipino girl has been acquitted in a drug trafficking case by a courtroom right here. The event on the backs of Narcotics Management Bureau (NCB) failing to show that the trolley bag from which 4.8kg of cocaine was seized belonged to her.
The lady, recognized as Jhonna De Torres Biag of San Pedro Laguna, Philippines, was acquitted by the Extra Classes Courtroom Choose Mohandas P Ok on January 23. As per the case particulars, she was arrested from Cochin airport on January 1, 2018 based mostly on a tip-off {that a} woman passenger by identify Jhonna Biag was arriving from Muscat by way of a Oman Airways flight and was suspected to hold a considerable amount of cocaine hid in her baggage.
Based mostly on this info, a NCB workforce performed a search of her check-in baggage and located 4.8kg of cocaine in two packets. Nevertheless, the girl denied the fees and contended that she was harmless of the offence. She maintained that she was visiting India as a part of her enterprise of exporting treasured stones from her native nation. She additionally said that the trolley baggage allegedly seized by the NCB don’t belong to her.
The NCB said that Biag was arrested when she was in possession of the 2 trolley baggage after taking it from the belt space of the airport. The contraband was hid in one of many trolley baggage. Nevertheless, the courtroom noticed that there is no such thing as a clear and dependable proof to point out that the trolley bag from which the contraband was seized belonged to the accused.
“So, even whether it is discovered that the identical contained cocaine, the accused can’t be mentioned to be in concious possession of the identical,” the courtroom mentioned, including that there was no correct sampling of the proof and there was inordinate delay in producing the property earlier than it.
“Although the chemical report present that the pattern contained cocaine, it can’t be mentioned that the articles seized is cocaine. For all these causes, it may be seen that the prosecution has not succeeded in proving past affordable doubt that the accused was present in possession of cocaine or that she imported the identical to India as alleged. The accused on this case is entitled to profit of doubt. With the accessible supplies on report it isn’t attainable to seek out that the accused dedicated the offence charged towards her. She is entitled to be acquitted of the cost,” the courtroom added.
[ad_2]
Source_link